The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
In creating his "sympathy" indicator he gives us ( as far a I know) a new econometric tool to utilise and to compare and contrast with existing analytical tools.
Now when analytical minds such as Migeru, and others on this site, hear the word "Sympathy" they reach for their revolvers and tend to dismiss what follows as some sort of idealistic theorising of little value in the "Real" world.
That is a big mistake, but flows from the Rhetoric and associations with the word "Sympathy" and its emotional connotations.
Rational people don't "do" emotiosn do they.
Now Robin was unwise enough - in a slip of the tongue -to call the variable "s" that he uses to assist in modelling transactions "indifference value".
I am sure he will castigate me for saying so, because he immediately attempted to withdraw the expression, but the cat was out of the bag!
Brutal though the phrase is in some ways, it is, I think useful as a rhetorical stick to beat conventional economists with since I believe (and this where the really good brains can get stuck in and maybe prove me right or wrong) that this "indifference value" gives us a new way as JA Wheeler put it, "to ask questions of Reality". When you are in power you have to stretch the truth, and then it won't ever go back to it's normal shape
But my point - and it has been brilliantly examined on ET in recent months - is that everything begins with the Rhetoric.
We have to take "their" Rhetoric and discourse and turn it against them.
That is what I am attempting to do when I talk about "asset-based" as distinguished from "deficit-based" finance. And more recently, by demonstrating new forms of "Public Equity" (using different legal forms to the Corporation) which people may then compare and contrast with the locust variety of "Private Equity".
Robin has IMHO something new, but if the descriptor is "tarnished" in some way by pre-conceptions and associations then he will get nowhere with it.
I would see the Economist etc giving short thrift to "Sympathy Value", but possibly a fair wind to "Indifference Value" particularly if it gives better results - (Does it? Examine Robin's work and tell me where he is wrong) - than the conventional bollocks.
And maybe in due course the world will be ready for "Sympathy" value, but right now, regrettably, I don't think it is... When you are in power you have to stretch the truth, and then it won't ever go back to it's normal shape
Keep driving right along...
And apologies for naming you! I guess you are the exception to the rule - it's just that you were the first "Analyst" that popped into my head, probably because of your high level of ET "presence".
The art is to be an "Analyst" without being "Anal" I guess... When you are in power you have to stretch the truth, and then it won't ever go back to it's normal shape
I demand a quotation now. Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
I demand a quotation now.
how's that?
it's a tone thing, and maybe quite different from how you are in meatspace.
Convince me
from our last discussion. it comes off as arrogant and in-your-face demanding, to me anyway.
more discursive, less confrontational, would be nice.
detached perhaps...
you have a great sense of humour, do you realise how abrasive you can be when sometimes you don't use it?
having said that, it's great that you're here, your contributions are outstanding, both in quality and quantity.
your ability to dig for thruth is amazing, reminds me of a jack russel terrier going down a badger hole!
thanks for your generosity, i'll come down off my horse now, thanks also for that good advice, lol!
it's not your fault you're brilliant, but too edgy you can do something about, that is if you care... "It guarantees silky vibrant skin and an eighteen percent reduction in panic attacks!" Jonathan Franzen.
since you asked: I demand a quotation now. how's that? it's a tone thing, and maybe quite different from how you are in meatspace.
As for the "convince me", you might want to reply in the right thread. It was actually not a one-liner, it was after "first you convince yourself, then you convince a friend, then you convince an enemy", which I believe is taken from Georg Polya. I remain unconvinced, by the way.
There are times when I actually want to be in-your-face, abrasive or edgy.
I'm actually worse in meatspace: there I don't do it on purpose. Can the last politician to go out the revolving door please turn the lights off?
hope it at least makes you feel better. peace out "It guarantees silky vibrant skin and an eighteen percent reduction in panic attacks!" Jonathan Franzen.
He has every right to demand that you present evidence to back up your assertion, especially given that you have not merely made it as a claim against him, but have made him the poster child for a nebulous group of "analytical minds". Utsukushikereba sore de ii
by Magnifico - Dec 21, 83 comments
by eurogreen - Dec 24, 45 comments
by DoDo - Dec 21, 13 comments
by DoDo - Dec 23, 18 comments
by Sven Triloqvist - Dec 24, 89 comments
by danps - Dec 18, 59 comments
by stevesim - Dec 24, 7 comments
by ChrisCook - Dec 22, 23 comments
by In Wales - Dec 19, 4 comments
by Magnifico - Dec 18, 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 16, 11 comments
by ChrisCook - Dec 16, 31 comments
by Ted Welch - Dec 15, 3 comments
by Migeru - Dec 15, 8 comments
by das monde - Dec 13, 76 comments
by danps - Dec 13, 54 comments
by afew - Dec 13, 39 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 12, 79 comments
by In Wales - Dec 11, 25 comments
by InAntalya - Dec 9, 15 comments