The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If I'm being altruistic to my brother or friends, not only do I implicitly expect similar treatment in return (i.e. there's a present value of future expected benefits involved), but this rather banal aspect aside, I also derive pleasure directly from doing it. For instance, I enjoy running errants for my girlfriend. Although it is partly offset by the annoyance of some of the tasks, generally it increases my utility because it's a way for me to signal to her how much I care and it elevates our relationship in my eyes.
In this way, altruistic impulses can easily be incorporated into a utility-based model with indifference curves. Simply stated: you just derive utility from altruism and "moral" behaviour. There's no reason why this is necessariloy an oxymoron.
It's certainly not a question of either Utility or Altruism, is it?
So modelling with different criteria and curves makes sense in principle, but the Devil's in the Detail (and the Definition) When you are in power you have to stretch the truth, and then it won't ever go back to it's normal shape
A lot of things (not only altruism) cannot be turned into numbers to feed into economics calculation, and thus aren't part of economic utility, despite attempts to turn this concept into an universal human behavior. Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
Funny you'd say that, because that's precisely what Economists do... when you cannot determine preferences to predict economic behaviour, use economic behaviour to infer preferences. But then you can no longer predict economic behaviour, although you can pretend that you can...
Revealed preference theory came about because the theories of consumer demand were based on a diminishing marginal rate of substitution. This diminishing MRS is based on the assumption that consumers make consumption decisions based on their intent to maximize their utility. While utility maximization was not a controversial assumption, the underlying utility functions could not be measured with great certainty. Revealed preference theory was a means to reconcile demand theory by creating a means to define utility functions by observing behavior.
But no, economists won't look at the other social sciences and see what they have to say about human behaviour. They ask the other social sciences to talk in Economics terms, but refuse to reciprocate. Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
In any case, I don't deny that it's a complicated subject and I'm no expert.
So at least for the basic utility models as taught in modern microeconomics, you can easily operationalise altruism as part of utility analysis.
However, the point I'm trying to make above relates to basic micro theory as presented in any run-of-the mill undergrad or basic post-grad course. In that "EC101" context, you can easily operationalise "altruism" in a classic utility-analysis framework where people behave as self-maximisers. The only thing you have to do is to say that some people derive utility from "altruism" or "moral behaviour" and hence prefer altruistic and moral choices, even if it hurts them in terms of e.g. money.
For instance, a typical simple post-grad micro exercise is the following:
"The preferences of a consumer are represented by the utility function u= x+y. The price of a unit of good x is 2, the price of a unit of good y is p, and the income of the consumer is M. Moreover, the consumer is given a lump-sum subsidy of that can only be used to purchase good y. (a) Define the utility maximisation problem of the consumer. (b) Suppose that p does not equal 2. Find the optimal amounts of x and y as functions of p, the subsidy and M."
(a) Define the utility maximisation problem of the consumer. (b) Suppose that p does not equal 2. Find the optimal amounts of x and y as functions of p, the subsidy and M."
So...I concede that applications are difficult, but the underlying theory itself is not invalidated by the "altruism" criticism.
by Magnifico - Dec 21, 83 comments
by eurogreen - Dec 24, 45 comments
by DoDo - Dec 21, 13 comments
by DoDo - Dec 23, 18 comments
by Sven Triloqvist - Dec 24, 89 comments
by danps - Dec 18, 59 comments
by stevesim - Dec 24, 7 comments
by ChrisCook - Dec 22, 23 comments
by In Wales - Dec 19, 4 comments
by Magnifico - Dec 18, 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 16, 11 comments
by ChrisCook - Dec 16, 31 comments
by Ted Welch - Dec 15, 3 comments
by Migeru - Dec 15, 8 comments
by das monde - Dec 13, 76 comments
by danps - Dec 13, 54 comments
by afew - Dec 13, 39 comments
by ARGeezer - Dec 12, 79 comments
by In Wales - Dec 11, 25 comments
by InAntalya - Dec 9, 15 comments